When I spoke with Sean and Jennifer again in this interview, it reminded me how important it is to preserve honesty in public health. I have known them both for years. They have always spoken from a place of clarity, research, and personal experience. And what they shared this time hit home even harder.
Sean described the silent culling of health professionals in the United States—not as a restructuring, but as a purge of voices that didn’t conform. He explained the subtle mechanisms that encouraged resignations through financial incentives and the quiet dismantling of public health offices that once held influence. When he spoke about the individuals being removed, what struck me most was the pain in his voice for those who were trying to do the right thing and were discarded anyway.
Jennifer, on the other hand, is the face of what happens when you speak truth to power. Fired for calling out manipulation in death reporting, she remains angry—but not defeated. Her reflections were sobering. She told the truth when it was not welcome and paid for it with her career. Her story is a cautionary tale and a call to conscience.
Together, we tackled difficult questions. Has public trust been broken beyond repair? What responsibility does leadership bear for the silence that followed the failures of COVID-19 policy? And perhaps most controversially, what do we make of RFK’s rise in public health and his unapologetic stance on vaccine reform?
We didn’t agree on everything. But we all agreed on this—public health must be built on transparency, truth, and trust. That means open debate. That means acknowledging mistakes. And that means standing by those harmed when the system fails.
This conversation wasn’t just a reflection. It was a roadmap.
We need to go back to basics: prioritize the public in public health, decouple politics from policy, and focus on real science. Not performative slogans. Real safety. Real data. Real change.
I hope RFK surrounds himself with those who will challenge him—not flatter him. This is not a moment for ideology. It’s a moment for courage. And for all our sakes, I hope those leading the next chapter of public health will remember the cost of silence.
Timecodes:
00:01:27 – Introduction and purpose of the conversation
00:03:01 – Sean introduces himself and his public health background
00:03:35 – Jennifer’s background in virology and epidemiology
00:04:52 – Sean explains the quiet reduction in public health workforce
00:07:16 – Jennifer shares her whistleblower experience and impact
00:09:48 – A discussion on the fall in trust for doctors and health officials
00:13:13 – Jennifer’s take on RFK’s stance on vaccine safety
00:15:44 – Sean critiques US healthcare outcomes and RFK's reform mission
00:18:00 – Jennifer urges the public to do their own research
00:20:01 – Package inserts and transparency in vaccine data
00:21:05 – Jennifer discusses the measles outbreak and live virus risks
00:23:07 – Sean stresses information-seeking behavior over passivity
00:29:01 – A broken public health system driven by politics
00:34:30 – The silence of public health amid ongoing viral circulation
00:43:01 – The vaccine mandate debate and long-term immune impact
01:22:00 – Final reflections on the failure to advocate for vaccine-injured
01:28:00 – Closing statements and advice to RFK's team
Vejon COVID-19 Review is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Share this post